In the heady days of my youth, I played organized sports. Should our team come to the field and find that the other team was down a man, we would do the sporting thing and play down a man as well. Some folks never learned the finer lessons of sportsmanship, and they regarded this type of action as "the nice thing to do" or as a charitable concession on our part. They never quite caught on to the fact that, if we had not put one of our boys on the sideline, we left ourselves open to two equally unpleasant outcomes: either we won with an unfair advantage, and claimed no glory, or we lost, even with an advantage, and reaped an even more bitter defeat. It's not a selfless act, it's a Machiavellian political calculation.
Cindy Sheehan has retired from the protest racket, effective today. If her press release is to be believed, we will never again be subjected to the stomach-turning sight of her being carted off by stone-faced peace officers, the signature mawkish grin of hippie nostalgia plastered across her face. This should be cause for relief among the Forces of Goodness and Light everywhere, because frankly, the woman was terrible at her (self-appointed) job. More even than by the war in Iraq, Sheehan and Bush are bound together by a shared and ghastly combination of basically good intentions, glaring incompetence, and woefully unfettered access to the bully pulpit. Sheehan's agitation for peace, like Bush's attempts to ward off the threat of tourism, ought to have been met with the same response as a five-year-old who attempts to drive the car to the grocery store to pick up milk and eggs: Golly gee, what a very nice thought, don't ever try anything like that again, YOU. ARE. NOT. QUALIFIED. This is a grown-up thing, a tool not a toy.
When offered a position as dreadfully important as "face of the anti-war movement," the first thing one ought to do is engage in some vigorous introspection. The very first question on one's mind ought to be "Am I up to this?" When I first heard that there was a grieving mother camped outside of the president's Texas cowboy playpen, I thought a valid and time-honored statement was being made about the American people's disagreement with the choices of their leadership. And for one brief, shining moment, it was. And then it devolved, predictably, into a peculiarly American variety of celebrity farce. Hippocrates summed it up pretty well when he said "First, do no harm." Because, you see, if you're not up to the job, there's quite a lot of harm to be done. The fracturing and/or discrediting of the (vitally important) peace movement, for instance, not to mention the entire (albeit already rather fractious) left wing of American politics.
So now that Sheehan is bowing out, apparently more from her own exhaustion than from any ability to read the writing on the wall, we here on left are obligated to accept the resignation of an equally embarrassing faux representative from the far right. I will accept Malkin, Coulter, Hannity, or Gonzales, unless anyone has a better suggestion. It's really only sporting of us, you know.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Exit, Staged Left
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
wait wait wait, she's doing this because Jerry Fallwell already .... errr... resigned....
Ah. Good point. You have a deal, sir.
glf, does Wolfowitz count? if he and Falwell make two, then the left has to give up someone else... i volunteer Markos. any seconds?
btw, hammerin' hank already has a plan for ann coulter's life:
http://worshiptheglitch.com/2006/06/henry-rollins-love-letter-to-ann.html
let's try this again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM7MR5_v47w
I don't think Moulitsas equates to Wolfowitz, trisyllabic surnamic similarities notwithstanding. I would be much more willing to give up Mark Mellman, Bob Shrum, Joe Hansen, or really just about any consultant employed by the Democratic party. Or Stephanopoulos, if you're still dead set on sacrificing a Greek in hopes of a fair wind.
this lady devoted her life to stopping the war. you write a barely-read, poorly-written weblog. maybe you should show some appreciation rather than being a catty Joan Rivers impersonator?
You lost me at the beginning: "In the heady days of my youth..."
Prosaic, at best.
Welcome, my anonymous friends! Firstly, if "heady days of my youth" is too prosaic for your taste, I don't imagine you're going to find a lot to like here, just to save you any further disappointment. Secondly, I'll show appreciation for anyone who proves to be effective at stopping the war. This is the real world, there are no points for effort. Not that your attempts to bruise my ego are unwelcome. We invite disagreement.
screw the position on anonymity. you can take that complaint to blogger. it's an option. people choose it. get over it.
It makes it difficult for me to differentiate opinions if two or more people do it. Not to assume that more than two people read this blog. Points are given for clever and/or situationally relevant aliases, though.
Wait, where exactly did you even take a "position" on anonymity? You said, "Welcome, my anonymous friends!"
To my anonymous friends-of-friend: Two points, enumerated below.
Ein -- the Sword writes like this because he talks like this. What is "like this," you may ask? Better than just about anyone I've ever met, I may respond.
Swei -- this may well mark the very first occasion upon which I've heard the Sword referred to as "catty." Kudos for originality. Can men be catty, or did I conveniently forget to notice his vagina? Ah, the questions that keep me up at night.
As for Joan Rivers, let's leave her out of this; she's too busy crying out of her forehead somewhere.
Hey FS, interesting comment section you got going here. This is your blog is it not? You are free to write your own opinions right? I mean you live in a land with some freedom speech and press laws correct? So it should be your freedom of choice whether or not to choose to show appreciate to anyone on your blog. Ok. I'll try to disagree with you as much as possible tho... I really will.
Oh and Kate, I find his writing interesting but not better than anyone I've ever met... but you did say better than anyone you've ever met... so I'll take you at your word. I'll be doing no ego stroking here, as much as I love him. :)
"So it should be your freedom of choice whether or not to choose to show appreciate to anyone on your blog."
Dave, are you writing your comments in German and then sending them through Google Translate before you post them? Because I can't parse this. Like, at all. But even given that, I'm going to assume your invocation of the First Amendment is gratuitous. Just based on historical evidence.
Also, just so you know, as a matter of general policy, I don't delete comments. Even the crazy ones. I may choose to ignore them, but I think deleting them is kind of dishonest. I mean, I haven't even covered up the obscenities keyed into my car, because I kind of feel like that would be a show of weakness. Hester Prynne reprazent, y'all.
Post a Comment